Should adapters be ranked? #611
Labels
No labels
Context: Async
Context: Bug
Context: CI
Context: Dependencies
Context: Documentation
Context: Enhancement
Context: Example
Context: Macro
Context: Runtime
Difficulty: Easy
Difficulty: Hard
Difficulty: Medium
Platform: Android
Platform: Linux
Platform: Web
Platform: Windows
Platform: iOS
Platform: macOS
Type: Discussion
Type: Evaluation
Type: Tracker
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
SakulFlee/Orbital#611
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Our old way of doing it basically is by assigning a "score" based on preset criteria per-device.
This was especially useful to filter out graphic API x device duplications (e.g. "Vulkan x dGPU" < "DX12 x dGPU").
We have just introduced a new way of requesting the graphics adapter, which uses some internal wgpu logic.
The question is if this is sufficient or if we need to bring back our own ranking function again.
For the archive, the old function is: